'Being and Nothingness'
Text I initially was told to read from Bernice over summer, thought the others might enjoy it as I realised we had shared interests in psychology and people in general when it came to art work.
The book challenges the reader to confront the fundamental dilemmas of human freedom, responsibility and action. It's approach challenged all previous assumptions about the individuals relationship with the world.
Sartre talks of 3 kinds of entity in existence; 'beings-in-themselves', 'beings-for-themselves' and 'beings-for-others'
BIT.-meaning a non-conscious thing, an essence which exists on its own from any observer
BFT.- meaning a conscious being, their consciousness renders them entirely different from other things- in relation both to themselves, to one another and to other things.
BFO.- an eavesdropper, entirely absorbed by getting his ear to the keyhole he barely distinguishes himself from his surroundings, suddenly hears a footstep in the hall and becomes aware he in under observation. He suddenly begins to exist in a different way- he begins
The descriptions he creates are not merely to illustrate a concept. But they are written for us as readers to understand the nature of the phenomenom by accepting the truthfulness of the story. In a similar way that we may be convinced by the truth of a representation e.g. life in a film or a novel.
Just going to give you one example' The Spirit Of Seriousness
The idea that people believe all values are absolute, given somehow independently of any human subjective judgement. This spirit makes us pretend that the quality of being desireable or undesireable is somehow a quality of the things themselves. Once this spirit is dismissed, it necessarily follow that a man will recognise himself as the source of all values, and when he has done this it will follow that he realizes that he can choose to value whatever he likes.
I'd say in relation to us all and philosophical ways of thinking;
Alisha and Claudia look more at the relationships with themselves,and the objects around them in particular whereas as well as looking at my relationship with myself I am more interested in other people and my relations with them. Whether it be something scientific or psychological or be emotions I relate to a certain person time or place which I have previously experienced personally. What influences this? Why do I do certain things or see things in a particular way?
Is it better to try understand it all from a mental health perspective?
This idea of constantly analysing the way i live and think and why we do the things we do I felt initially would help me solve some of my own personal issues, which is where my work usually rises from, but from being this outside viewer constantly looking in and evaluating things, creates this strange distance and relationship with myself that can be quite tiring and isolating.
Audiences and the viewers experience.
After discussion we all seemed to be interested in ideas around the viewers experience of our own art work, some wanting a specific audience and some more unsure. I personally want my work to be universal. Regarding the viewers experience we all agree that a big part of our work is creating to trigger some kind of emotion in our audience. We believe this type of art work is the most rewarding to create in the sense that we're not just communicating our work with our own interests and perspectives in mind but looking at a wider picture. The idea of galleries nowadays. Most exhibitions I go to don't seem inspiring. This idea of having to know lots of context before even entering a gallery and have a higher understanding of the arts is projected in most exhibitions. I think it limits arts audience as a whole. People feel like they dont have enough knowledge or don't think in the 'right way' therefore feel they don't 'get' the work and automatically dismiss it. I want to focus more on WHERE I exhibit because it is important.
Can we ever truly communicate what we want to anyway? How important is this?
Aware that viewers will reflect their own personal experiences onto the work therefore will all take something different.